Max Harcore sentenced to prison

Meanwhile max is going on...



EuroRevenue Enters Into Partnership with Max World Inc. Home of Legendary Adult Superstar Max Hardcore

November 25, 2008 - Global affiliate leader EuroRevenue (www.EuroRevenue.com) today announced it has entered into a partnership with legendary American producer Max Hardcore.

Under the terms of the agreement, EuroRevenue will design, build, market and maintain a new pay site showcasing the extensive Max Hardcore library of best-selling movies which date from 1992. The partnership will mark a new European expansion of the Max Hardcore brand, and on to sustained world-wide growth.

The new EuroRevenue pay site, called HardcoreMax.com™, is scheduled for launch in several months, after completion of the enormous task of digitalizing and organizing Max’s extensive archive of video masters and photography. The principles of both companies couldn’t be happier.

Said EuroRevenue owner and founder Joe Holm, “This is one of the most exciting partnerships we’ve ever cultivated. Max Hardcore® is a world-wide name brand, and his movies have cachet across the globe. Being able to call Max Hardcore a content partner is a milestone for EuroRevenue. This is a man who transcends the adult space. He is a pop cultural icon. We are all very proud, and we look forward to a highly productive and profitable future together.”

From Webmaster Access West, where the contract was inked this week, Max expressed excitement and optimism about the joint venture.

“I’ve been seeking just the right European digital media partner for some time, and am very excited about embarking on a new phase in my long career. A major deal like this eventually has the potential to be very lucrative, but only if both sides have a long-term commitment. Also crucial is an unwavering commitment to quality and customer service, all powered by the latest user-friendly technology.

“I was looking for a company with a solid reputation who had the capacity and aspiration to promote my brand to the widest possible audience, not just in Europe, but also on a global scale. I feel that the best choice would be a company lead by a relatively young man who really understands the technology, what new consumers are looking for, and how they want to access it.

“After extensive research into all possible scenarios, I chose Joe Holm and his company to be a key component of my continued growth in the world marketplace. My team and his will be working together on every aspect of design, development and operation of all new joint ventures, to protect and promote the Max Hardcore brand, and bring consumers what they demand.”

Under the terms of the agreement, members of HardcoreMax.com will have access to the entire Max Hardcore catalog, including titles under popular lines Extreme Schoolgirls, Planet Max, Golden Guzzlers, Fists of Fury, and Universal Max, as well as the rest of his lines.

EuroRevenue CEO Todd Glider said that affiliates should check back frequently for more news on the new partnership. Max World Entertainment Marketing Director Richard Barrios encourages all Max Hardcore webmasters, as well as all others, to get on over to EuroRevenue and get on board.

Said Todd Glider, “We will be putting together a site and a marketing message that leverages the brand to an international audience like never before. Expect multilingual tours, extreme trailers and loads of cutting-edge marketing tools. Look for great payouts and special promotions. EuroRevenue has built its reputation marketing extreme sites to a global audience. We intend to use every tool at our disposal to guarantee HardcoreMax.com meets with unparalleled success.”

Well, he took a risk and look what happened. I'm sure he'll have a lot of time to think about it. I, personally, never saw a Max Hardcore porn but I heard a lot about them and it made me kind of avoid them to tell you the truth.

peeper80 wrote:

His stuff is kinda twisted, chicks dressed to look y*unger than they are, he gets them to call him Daddy and then fucks their asses and pisses on them, not forgetting making them GAG and puke.

I've seen some of his stuff and have to save the most disturbing thing about it is the expression on some the chicks faces when he starts getting real nasty.. It's like they are saying to themselves. " please god let this end soon" ....

Hah, yea Max is a sick puppy but he made a mint from his DVD's

sometimes it's very hard to watch those girls because of hardcore. it feels like it's borderline **** to me. it's so abusive.

His models are about the best lookin' chicks out there in the industry.

His methods are about the most horrible.

Oh, sure it's fine to have a model literally "Crying" on the screen if she's actually acting.
But I'd be willing to say that most if not all models are HONESTLY crying by the end of the video.
Well, that is except for the one(s) that play the part of being his "girl-finder"

Typically i don't delete anything i download without writing to DVD, but i did download some of his stuff cause certain girls did scenes with him, and... oh, i would say i watched a small bit of 3 out of the 10 i queued up on Emule, and just deleted them all.

Sick stuff.
Sick concept
Sick man

And i can see good actresses giving up the biz after doing a scen with him!

It's shiest like this that needs to be eliminated, and stop worry so much about the "Oh, that chick might have been 3 months under 18 when she was filmed. In this case the "protection" is more likely to harm them, as it can ruin their carreer, Ketty Dreams for example. Rumors about 2 or 3 sets with MetArt whch were pulled killed her carreer from what i can make of it.

But DAMN! that guy pulled in 1.4 million dollars in worth doing that stuff.
Guess there must be a shiest-load of people that like it.
Maybe i'm in the wrong business... na... i couldn't do that, for any amount.

Right where he belongs. Sick bastard.

I saw a few of his clip before I decided to keep away from it.

There is a difference between sex between obviously consenting people, and sex where one person actually does look quite unsettled or even unhappy with the process at the end.

One gets the impression that things went too far for the girl, or that she was not prepared. In my mind, anything goes as long as it's ethical, equitable and fair to all parties.

There's a documentary on the porn industry called "How Porn Conquered the World." About 28 minutes in, they sit in on a Max Hardcore recruitment of a young girl. He asks her if she's seen one of his movies, she answers no. He allows her to sign the contract anyway.

Sociopaths exist in business everywhere in the world. They're often good businesspeople as they are ruthless and focussed. But when they are in charge of another person's well-being, things are bound to go wrong. That's not a value judgement, it's common sense.

Here's the doco in case anyone's interested. The piece about Max is brief but very telling in that way. You don't ask someone to sign consent for something they know nothing about; it's exploitative.

Code:

dead link dead link dead link dead link

[ed] fixed the RS links

zymurgy wrote:
Scary. An apparent long winded rant against the horrors of MH which turns out to actually be a subtle way of saying "come on, und3r@ge porn isn't so bad by comparison, now is it?" And even further that protecting k1d$ against the predatory industry is somehow more harmful to them than the industry would be!

This is the thought process of criminals (and politicians). "Well, it's not so bad if I **** her...as long as I don't kill her too, because that would be really bad."

Right and wrong do not exist in a vacuum, and certainly one can distinguish varying relative degrees of wrong within the same category of crime (e.g. robbery vs. armed robbery), but to compare completely different crimes and use one to justify the other is logically indefensible and morally bankrupt.

The problem with this is not convicting him, it's where it leads. Yea, he may have been sick to many people, but who defines 'sick' and 'offensive'?

There are plenty of people out there who deem the stuff we think as normal as 'sick' and 'offensive', and would love to destroy the entire porn industry. Sure, it starts with the extreme guys, then they start cracking down on the general fetish guys, then before we know it, cumming on a girls face is considered crude and offensive. Before we know it, we're jerking off to pictures of girls just flashing their ankles.

Btw, what's up with them watching his porn for 8 hours? lol

vanillaice wrote:

I'd like to have overheard their lunch break conversation. Or lack thereof. Or standing at the food counter, staring suspiciously at the cheese sausage.

there is another guy that makes movies like max does.. slap happy i think they are called..

wasn't he busted by the cops too?

NM8 wrote:

Obviously because he hasn't broken any laws. The law doesn't prevent people from making the movies specifically. From what I gather, in the state of Florida it prevents distribution or import from other states or something along those lines. That's what they got him on. Not making the movies.

It's just a pity there isn't more regulation regarding treatment of the girls. I mean think about it... in a workplace, you can have someone for sexual harassment if they do something inappropriate.

But these girls, many of them unhappy with the treatment they got, signed a legal waiver, probably too complicated for them to understand, allowing him to do what he wants, possibly waiving any right to compensation for injury, hardship, illness, etc. It would be interesting to read that contract.

Would you sign a contract from any employer, no matter which industry, saying you consent to behaviour from your employer which will include unwelcome, unwanted or possibly harmful physical contact? Ok, that applies to many sports - but they are also supported by some tough regulation. You can't punch someone playing rugby. Everyone knows what the rules are. Do the girls know the rules? Are their any?

The girls should be provided plain-English (or Thai, Mandarin, Spanish or whatever) explaining specifically what activities will or could be performed, and they should not be allowed to sign if they don't understand or haven't seen examples. Kidz (and 20-somethings ARE kidz) can so easily be traumatised, pushed into depression, have their trust in adults and society damaged.

Is that what we want just so we can gawk at pussy? It's not like there aren't proper reasonable ways of doing this - lots of girls will do this stuff willingly and in full knowledge and consent, and that's fine. But as caring people we should not tolerate ANY less than that.

It's hard to believe some people will bitch about the economy and oh! we should clap bank execs in irons because they deceived us into trusting them with our cash! And on the other hand not give a toss about ignorant/naive/foreign young girls being taken advantage of, in a much more personally damaging way.

It's one thing to get off on a **** fantasy or something, where it's clear that it's an act for the camera. But quite another to enjoy knowing that a girl really did not like what was happening in a scene and is really upset about it. Then you need to start thinking about your motives a little.

I know I would never sign a contact that allowed anyone to piss on my face

sonyman1232002 wrote:

How about for US$1M? Everyone has their price, come on, what's yours for a squirt of the ol lemon juice?

chocophilia wrote:

is that cash or cheque please sir!!!!