Author
karlafan
VIP club member
Added: Jul 26, 2010 9:45 pm
I'm pretty close to calling it a day with Forumophilia.

Whatever compromises are made, these changes have left a real sour taste in my mouth and I'm not sure I want to be a part of the forum any more.
bobquantum
I'm probably spamming
Added: Jul 26, 2010 9:46 pm
ayebite wrote:
Ok, then let me replace "we" with "them".

Better?
And how do you think am I feeling now?
Just keep hitting on me. Great.
And for the content provider: Maybe I didn't post 3,000 videos at this board, but I surely did at others. And more than one time a board COMPLETE forbid the hoster I was using.

And dang: 2 years of work deleted. In one day. Not one "sorry" or ANY explanation. Just some note that "shrmtrx" is now the main sponsor of the board and claimed to make the following hosters to become illegal and all posts to be removed.

That is what happened to me. Those board owners just didn't give a FUCK about my status at all. In fact they even BANNED be 3 days later for my signature.

Just for your information.

For my information that you can completely relate to what's happened here, but still come in and help facilitate it. You can slag yourself off better than I ever could - I'm just here to help alienate everyone who used this board up until a week ago, but I know how they feel so it's ok.

Bloody hell, I feel like I've just glassed a Fulham supporter in a Chelsea pub the day after the Europa final.
RabidSquirrel
Good Poster
Added: Jul 26, 2010 9:50 pm
ayebite wrote:
I think we are close to some general agreement now!

You see: ---> The 25 posts per day rule was at least one effective solution to stop the SO MASSIVELY criticized spamming (I am still not sure if that is the correct term for people just posting too much) and to make those guys happy that were in SUCH a hard rage about those mass posters.
NOW you say the number is too small...

*sigh*

I think everybody can see now how hard it is to make everybody happy.

But we are close...VERY close to find a good solution for everybody.
Come on guys! We can do this!

Please make some good suggestions, everyone!


Ok i'll make a suggestion:

Allow posters to make as many posts as they like as long as they post them in as few as possible threads, only post sets/videos from allowed sites and only on allowed filehosts.

That would be nice!

P.S. I know you said you have nothing to do with the technical aspects, but why (as far as I can see) have you set it up to give members with over 5000 posts the title "Retired Legend" ?

RabidSquirrel
ayebite
Respected Poster
Added: Jul 26, 2010 10:08 pm
bobquantum wrote:
ayebite wrote:
Ok, then let me replace "we" with "them".

Better?
And how do you think am I feeling now?
Just keep hitting on me. Great.
And for the content provider: Maybe I didn't post 3,000 videos at this board, but I surely did at others. And more than one time a board COMPLETE forbid the hoster I was using.

And dang: 2 years of work deleted. In one day. Not one "sorry" or ANY explanation. Just some note that "shrmtrx" is now the main sponsor of the board and claimed to make the following hosters to become illegal and all posts to be removed.

That is what happened to me. Those board owners just didn't give a FUCK about my status at all. In fact they even BANNED be 3 days later for my signature.

Just for your information.

For my information that you can completely relate to what's happened here, but still come in and help facilitate it. You can slag yourself off better than I ever could - I'm just here to help alienate everyone who used this board up until a week ago, but I know how they feel so it's ok.

Bloody hell, I feel like I've just glassed a Fulham supporter in a Chelsea pub the day after the Europa final.


I am not going to make a list what I am trying to do to help to get things back to normal here. But you may have noticed that we have some "anti spam rule" that even affected me today since I originally wanted to post my @lsscan site rip and was blocked after only 6 post.

So what would be the alternative if I said: NOT with me? Perhaps you remember the person you talked to before I was here 14 hours a day. I don't think life was much easier with him. Or was it?

May I one more ASK you what your wishes are? And please not those general talk "back to 2009". Give me some detailed REQUESTS. That is the thing I can offer you.

Let me tell you about that largest image board of the world... I won't say the name...but "memes" are generated there..and "lulz"...I have been at that board since 2006 and ALL I could hear from the users there SINCE 2006 was that that board was dead. During that time nevertheless the traffic of that board exploded from 10,000.000 to now 705,000,000 page impressions per month. Those are 705 MILLION views a month.

And ALL I hear from that board is "this site is dead" and "give us back our board like it was 2006".

Telling me that I am somewhat betraying this board while I at least try to make things at least a bit better is hard.
bobquantum
I'm probably spamming
Added: Jul 26, 2010 10:21 pm
Ugh.
I. Don't. Care. About. Other. Sites. Or. YOU.

Two weeks ago, I was able to update my three threads daily with my sets uploaded to my File Host of choice and promote it with an upload to my image host of choice. I can still do all of that (eventually). But what I cannot do is prevent my links from being pulled down within minutes of them being put up.

Go back to my old Bounty thread. Unprotected or under-protected links and every last one of them is dead like whatever the fuck you're talking about. Now go to the Village or my Wayback MMMachine (2 or 3) or my Q3 threads. The only dead sets are the ones that went too long without a DL. Why? Because they were protected. Safety? Popups? Grow up - block your popups and install jdownloader or risk the consequences.

If that isn't specific enough, I don't know what is. But to answer your other question - two weeks ago, I never had to talk to anybody about anything - nothing was fucking broken. We talked to people around here because we liked each other. But while I actually have your attention and we're talking about rules, I noticed this a few minutes ago...

Quote:
(b:3) Use only permitted image hosting, file sharing or link protection sites (see rule 3). A lot of image and file hosting sites are not acceptable here. This is to protect our members not because we want to be authoritarian. Many hosting sites have a lot of pop-ups, re-direct to somewhere you don’t want to go and some even download spyware or Trojans.Also if a hosting site redirects, causes excessive pop ups, requires registration, installs javascripts, or pays the uploader we don't allow it here. Also no containers of any form, it makes it so MODs can't verify that the material is allowed here.

Ummm... so the new (b:0) is fun, but (b:3) tells me all those oron links need deleting and fast. Rules is rules.
ayebite
Respected Poster
Added: Jul 26, 2010 10:22 pm
RabidSquirrel wrote:
ayebite wrote:
I think we are close to some general agreement now!

You see: ---> The 25 posts per day rule was at least one effective solution to stop the SO MASSIVELY criticized spamming (I am still not sure if that is the correct term for people just posting too much) and to make those guys happy that were in SUCH a hard rage about those mass posters.
NOW you say the number is too small...

*sigh*

I think everybody can see now how hard it is to make everybody happy.

But we are close...VERY close to find a good solution for everybody.
Come on guys! We can do this!

Please make some good suggestions, everyone!


Ok i'll make a suggestion:

Allow posters to make as many posts as they like as long as they post them in as few as possible threads, only post sets/videos from allowed sites and only on allowed filehosts.

That would be nice!

P.S. I know you said you have nothing to do with the technical aspects, but why (as far as I can see) have you set it up to give members with over 5000 posts the title "Retired Legend" ?

RabidSquirrel


Thank you. I have NO idea about that title and it personally does not make any sense to me.

Your thread limitation solution is in fact one idea that was generated as some other board where I tried to reduce the VERY significant post flooding.

I WILL suggest that here right away. At least those "the very best of my collection" threads are not useful at all in my opinion.

the MAIN problem is with the "one thread to rule them all" solution (how I named it back then when I suggested it") is, that many users MASSIVELY protested because they said it is not fair to merger the lesbian, BDSM, pissing and shemale stuff into ONE giant thread.

So effectively NOTHING changed since "those guys" just continued to use very different topics you simply could not merge (as I explained).

All that was left was the more general idea to only make "Quality Postings" , So I personally believe that the 25 posts per day solution is the MOST strict and yet MOST effective way to reduce the massive flooding.

And I can tell you that I know some guys that post up to 600 (!!!) videos a day in over 30 threads. The effect was that the MAIN boards were TOTALLY ruled by 5 or 6 guys making new posts every 20 seconds (!!!).

I don't want to have this here - not even in the "main porn board" and the "clip" section.

Yes, those forums do exist. I called them "zombie forums" that were slowly infected with some deadly "mass flooding post" virus. So I tried to warn the admins about that upcoming problem since I almost know ALL the major porn forums around the world (I indeed do) and thus almost all the "guys" .

MY suggestion would be to limit the total amount of posts to perhaps 35-40 and 3 different threads. OR you chose to use ONE thread where you can use up ALL of your 40 posts.

I would STRONGLY oppose the hope of reasonable "fast posters" since we would probably have the described problem of 600 posts a day per "power user" within some weeks.
ayebite
Respected Poster
Added: Jul 26, 2010 10:38 pm
bobquantum wrote:
Ugh.
I. Don't. Care. About. Other. Sites. Or. YOU.

Two weeks ago, I was able to update my three threads daily with my sets uploaded to my File Host of choice and promote it with an upload to my image host of choice. I can still do all of that (eventually). But what I cannot do is prevent my links from being pulled down within minutes of them being put up.

Go back to my old Bounty thread. Unprotected or under-protected links and every last one of them is dead like whatever the fuck you're talking about. Now go to the Village or my Wayback MMMachine (2 or 3) or my Q3 threads. The only dead sets are the ones that went too long without a DL. Why? Because they were protected. Safety? Popups? Grow up - block your popups and install jdownloader or risk the consequences.

If that isn't specific enough, I don't know what is. But to answer your other question - two weeks ago, I never had to talk to anybody about anything - nothing was fucking broken. We talked to people around here because we liked each other. But while I actually have your attention and we're talking about rules, I noticed this a few minutes ago...

Quote:
(b:3) Use only permitted image hosting, file sharing or link protection sites (see rule 3). A lot of image and file hosting sites are not acceptable here. This is to protect our members not because we want to be authoritarian. Many hosting sites have a lot of pop-ups, re-direct to somewhere you don’t want to go and some even download spyware or Trojans.Also if a hosting site redirects, causes excessive pop ups, requires registration, installs javascripts, or pays the uploader we don't allow it here. Also no containers of any form, it makes it so MODs can't verify that the material is allowed here.

Ummm... so the new (b:0) is fun, but (b:3) tells me all those oron links need deleting and fast. Rules is rules.


The topic now is link protection. I have some year long experience with that. FIRST of all "link protection" is - in my humble opinion - some cash grabbing service that gives SOME DEGREE of protection in addition.

ALL of the linkprotectors work together with some major SPAM company providing adverts. EVERY protector with its own company, but ALL do have some "parent" advert company in the back.

No matter if you use SC.in or LNKSAVE.in: it works all the same with some REALLY annoying adverts as pop up or pop under. Moreover those nice "protection" services pay you cash for every annoying pop up any user had to endure.

I can assure you that those "link savers" are forbidden at probably 80% of the major porn sites. They ARE. if you don't care for that - I can't help you. But I can 100% ASSURE that the BAN of ANY link protectors was requested ENDLESSLY at MANY forums I know.

I personally step away from my link protectors after I received many complains by my thread readers about those fucking annoying adverts. So I moved back to post plain naked links.
ALSO I got banned at Pbb WITHOUT any warnings and after 500,000 threadclicks after I used lnksfe.in only ONCE:

DO you know what the mod send me regarding my lifetime ban after 2,000 posts and 500,000 clicks?

"Get the fuck out with your linkprotection scum. You are a cashwhore"

That was in my mail.


I made a screenshot of that nice comment after 2 years of dedicated posting on that board. At pltszy ANY linkprotection is banned anyway. Same at EXB - just to name you the big 5 now.

And I know: you don't care about the world outside of FO.

And finally: THOSE link-protectors do NOT protect your links at all. they might prolong the period of time until your files are deleted - but they WILL be deleted if you are using the wrong file hoster. And I experienced that with RS and lnksv.in
ayebite
Respected Poster
Added: Jul 26, 2010 10:48 pm
My I kindly remind you all that even MU pays you 10,000$ for 5 million unique IP downloads????
It seems that everybody is totally ignoring the fact that MU is some hoster paying you out CASH for the traffic you generate. And as far as I can remember even RS paid CASH at least until March. Or paid you out with some nice amazon coupons and cameras...hmm?

But yes....better not talk about those facts. Just hit on ORON.
Di-Natali
Very Respected Poster
Added: Jul 26, 2010 10:52 pm
Now where attacking MU?

You want us to shit-up about Oron, but not about MU!
The only deference about these 2 hosts is, 1 of them is FREE USERS FRIENDLY.
ayebite
Respected Poster
Added: Jul 26, 2010 10:57 pm
Di-Natali wrote:
Now where attacking MU?

You want us to shit-up about Oron, but not about MU!
The only deference about these 2 hosts is, 1 of them is FREE USERS FRIENDLY.


No. we are not. And I know you very well, Di Natali, from some major Russian forum where you posted many great @lsscan stuff.

I ALSO know, dear Di Natali, that almost ALL of your precious @ls-scan posts were deleted at that Russian forum in no time because the hoster you were using is tending to kill your links in no time.

I just wanted to say that at some degree every hoster wants to make money. And as you may have noticed: MU and RS are allowed here.

Actually I am very grateful to you, Di Natali, for the great stuff you have been posting.
RabidSquirrel
Good Poster
Added: Jul 26, 2010 11:05 pm
I really have a hard time seeing the problem - if you have 600 quality videos (a decent length, good quality and resolution and a modern codec) and you post them in a short time - then I can't really see how that can be seen as spamming.

I mostly(almost exclusively) post softcore sets from the major sites (Femjoy,Met,W4B,Errotica,MCN etc.) and yes if I haven't posted in a few days my threads go down the list, but then I could just post my sets more often. I wouldn't call other people posting their sets spamming.

It just have to be up to the mods to merge threads which are too small or plainly made to get on the top of the list, but posting quality material is not bumping your thread.

But to make sure that people don't mass-post a lot of sets videos quickly, you could make some rules about how many thumbnails there should be, how much info, maybe the layout etc.

This is how I post on another forum:

Quote:

Anna AJ - Never Enough

screenshot screenshot screenshot screenshot

screenshot

150 Photos | JPG | MQ | 82 MB

screenshot

Link deleted as that filehost is not allowed here


If you made a rule that they should have at least this many thumbnails, that much info etc. (for movies filesize,resolution,codec,format), if you did that you would make sure that there wouldn't be as much post-flooding.

Or just make an easy adjustment to the rules - instead of the 5 posts a day with 5 sets in each post then allow 25 posts/day. That's big enough for most big posters and does make it hard for the copy/pasters out there who post their links on 20 boards (or more).

And again I think we both know that the reason for the outrage over the new posters "spamming" is that they are posting using Oron, if they had used RS, we wouldn't be discussing this.

RabidSquirrel
ayebite
Respected Poster
Added: Jul 26, 2010 11:13 pm
RabidSquirrel wrote:
I really have a hard time seeing the problem - if you have 600 quality videos (a decent length, good quality and resolution and a modern codec) and you post them in a short time - then I can't really see how that can be seen as spamming.

I mostly(almost exclusively) post softcore sets from the major sites (Femjoy,Met,W4B,Errotica,MCN etc.) and yes if I haven't posted in a few days my threads go down the list, but then I could just post my sets more often. I wouldn't call other people posting their sets spamming.

It just have to be up to the mods to merge threads which are too small or plainly made to get on the top of the list, but posting quality material is not bumping your thread.

But to make sure that people don't mass-post a lot of sets videos quickly, you could make some rules about how many thumbnails there should be, how much info, maybe the layout etc.

This is how I post on another forum:

Quote:

Anna AJ - Never Enough

screenshot screenshot screenshot screenshot

screenshot

150 Photos | JPG | MQ | 82 MB

screenshot

Link deleted as that filehost is not allowed here


If you made a rule that they should have at least this many thumbnails, that much info etc. (for movies filesize,resolution,codec,format), if you did that you would make sure that there wouldn't be as much post-flooding.

And again I think we both know that the reason for the outrage over the new posters "spamming" is that they are posting on Oron, if they had used RS, we wouldn't be discussing this.

RabidSquirrel


For the last suggestion: do not underestimate the technical possibilities some guys have. THEY can and WILL match EVERY info rule you put up onto them. In no time by the way. I don't want to go into detail HOW that is possible but I managed to do just the same. You may also know that SOME (those are only 3 or 4) guys are able to post 600 videos a day AT THE SAME TIME in over 300 boards.

And yes: I would love to post my 2 terabyte of @l*scan here AT ONCE but the 5 posts per day rule blocks me. SURE: quality posts are NO SPAMMING. In no way.

But think about the stuff I explained: no matter how detailed you wish them to post in their posting - they will match those exigencies.

And I also do not think that anybody will try to post 600 videos a day here. They will not do that. The maximum we had were 60 posts I think.
ayebite
Respected Poster
Added: Jul 26, 2010 11:24 pm
Some Idea I have could be to allow 50 or more posts a day at special sections of the board like "babe pictures" ONLY. I am not sure if that is a cure or cancer for those boards.

Another possibility would be to RISE the amount of allowed posts with some more positive reputation you get by "thumbs up" or "thank you" you may collect for every post you make.

I think I would suggest my last idea: If the people really love your posts and you get a positive response you should be allowed to post more in your thread.

Does this solution sounds good?

On the other hand they would have to install and program that "reputation" script collecting and counting all of your "thumbs ups" or "thumbs down" for your posts. I have no idea how hard that is regarding the programming. I know though that EB was down for 3 weeks due to those new features last year.
Di-Natali
Very Respected Poster
Added: Jul 26, 2010 11:27 pm
You turn things fast around.

So what, you know me!
F*BO is not where I post anymore.
It's a hatefull place.

Don't deny my point of view. It is correct.
Like most posters here, I care about the people who download.
If Oron can give a faster download speed and smaller waiting period and bigger packages than MU.
Than it may have a chance here.

And if your Russian, I suggest you don't go check my last post I made at F*BO.
sacto
Good Poster
Added: Jul 26, 2010 11:31 pm
Question do the other mods speak? would help get to know them!