Loui375 wrote:Guess that's what i meant,
'K
IMO that is clear (even
) because that makes sense: files, which are deleted on 60 days of inactivity don't need to be kept alife using Rapids.
That's the same like before the changes when files were in a CA or a PA with more than 50GB.
btw. checking "Automatically delete inactive files" seems the only way to "delete" files (without using Rapids for a package wich allows deletion?)
My problem is that there is no way to prevent RS from wasting Rapids.
I gues i'm not the only one who is not getting any new Rapids from now on, because i'm not going to buy some. I'd like to swith to RapidFree
(And i'm not going to buy an account at MU just for (remote)-uploading either.)
This new system is NOT flexible, NOT cheap and obviously NOT easy to understand.
RS wrote:All features of the new model will be explained in further detail on June 29, 2010 on rapidshare.com.
Waiting ...
Obviously they don't even test the new stuff somewhere, it's all done life! Minor changes every now and then ...
If uploader don't wipe their accounts because they use a different hoster, then files will stay online for a while.
Some will continue uploading, because sharing doesn't mean earning money and because many people sill have accounts for downloading (on a very reliable, but expensive hoster).
Hosts, which offer any kind of reward (free 'premium'-account) are much more attractive for uploaders, but of course it's possible to share something without to think of getting a free account.
matadorstuff wrote:I'm in a similar situation; by the time my account
was due to expire I'd have probably had 5000 Free + 5000 Premium (= 1 month extension), but now those points will just be wasted