Just an opinion on those sites exclusively blacklisted because of their incentives including money:
-The main reason why they are blacked out is the danger of spam/point whoring and trash posting. Simply blacklisting them is the least administrative work. Still, in other boards that permit these hosters these trash and spam posts are also quite rare: a minimum number of posts before you are allowed to post in sections reserved for sharing combined with a rigorous immediate ban for spamming and posting trash makes this practice unattractive. You have to spend too much time in "validating" your forum membership to make it worthwhile for the meager amount of points you generate before you're kicked for good... sure, you could register under a new nick, but then you have to go through the paces again...even in Bangladesh no one will work an hour for say 25 cents...
And concerning "selling" premium accounts: if an uploader gets a bonus if someone buys a premium account, I wouldn't care too much either, as long as it is not compulsory to buy and the free access is not choked so much as to be unusable... My personal criteria for that would be a speed of 100 to 150 kb/s, not too much wait time between downloads (up to max 1 hour maybe, I dunno what the average is as I am RS premium for quite some time now) and no proliferation of ads (one ad while waiting or one popup would be OK, that is filterable and these guys have to live, too). DLManager support would not be one of the expected features for free users IMO...
Just my 2 Eurocents
And yes, a new "standard hoster" would be great as I love my high download speeds but would rather not pay four hosters just because files are spread evenly between them... Optimum would be if it is one that is preferred on European boards also, they tend to lean heavily towards uploaded, hotfile and shragle...
Greets
Micha