To honored members,
It's good to have an open discussion about new/additional filehosts especially since as a member of another forum board that recently allows Hotfile and Sharingmatrix, I've personally seen the effect of changes to filehost options particularly allowing HF and SM.
Now the good is that both Hotfile and Sharingmatrix, in my experience, are fairly good quality filehost services. I've had some people complain that Sharingmatrix download speeds are slower and sometimes connectivity to Sharingmatrix gets interrupted, but for the most part, both are quite good.
Now the bad: when this other forum allowed Hotfile and Sharingmatrix, the boards were absolutely flooded with newly joined posters uploading low-quality posts and old inactive members suddenly posting average content. It was to the point where if you refreshed the board after 5 minutes, and a completely new set of posts would fill the first page of the board. The obvious reason is because Hotfile and Sharingmatrix offers cash incentives for files downloaded and whether it was posting low-quality clips or reposting content 3 or 4 times in a row, it was simply ridiculous... and this is only within 3 days!
I guess what I'm saying is as much as I do like using Hotfile, if there are any other quality filehosters that don't offer cash incentives for files downloaded, that would probably be the route to go. I can easily see a flood of posts initially and possibly for quite some time from "cash-host vultures" if Forumophilia allows Hotfile and Sharingmatrix.
Again, I'm not saying HF and SM are bad filehosts - they're actually very good from my experience. I just hope if HF/SM are allowed, it doesn't ruin the quality posts here and well-maintained order of this enjoyable forum.
To sum it up, let's see if there are other quality filehost services that don't have cash incentives. If there aren't, try a trial run with Hotfile and hope cash-host vultures don't divebomb flood this forum.