Should we ban uploaded.net?

Voted Yes

Quote:

I used them for some time and although I didn't have much of problems with the service, I received lot of complaints from people that couldn't access UL for some reason. Bear in mind that they banned US traffic when 0ron went down so I guess they are still restrictive to some countries. And to be honest, I always had premium account - never managed to download anything as free user my own.

Maybe introducing mirroring rule like on other big forum is also not bad idea.

I voted yes because in all the time its been running I have NOT been able to download anything. Now when I see it as filehoster I just ignore thread

Haven't used them for a while but when I did their premium service was very fast.

I voted yes because they ban me in past without reason.. I don't post ch-lds or an-mal p0rn . They don't give to me no information !

No.
Best filehost and alternative for k2s.
Full speed for premium, stable and always pays.

Nucky wrote:

vote ban

it is obvious
Active members, who don't uses UL.to votes for "Yes", because
Those, who had premium on UL.to will be must to buy premium on another filehosts.
And maybe, they will buy premium from their links.

as a results, I will be happy if k2s, DF, FJ will banned...
its human psychology...

kvasdapil wrote:

WOW genius!

It is high time a current he himself buried!
_________________
Hot Amateur Softcore photo sets
BDSM, Bondage, Humiliation, Torture video
PornoStars Oral, Blowjob, Facial,Cumshot Compilation (NEW)

I vote "NO"

1 One of the oldest filehostings with not bad reputation.
2 A lot of users like it for good download speed
3 Do not delete files for the first abuse like some another (RG, K2S...)
4 Have good reputation on a lot forums.
5 Have stability in work.

Vote for YES - but please add a new allowed/recommended hoster as a replacement.

Uploaded was good but it sucks now. But I'm having problems with K2S and FJ as well – and they are incredibly expensive compared to other hosters. So I would be happy to see another recommended hoster.

nasad1965 wrote:

No offense,but that's probably the worst type of reasoning for any host.

1 that allows illegal content to remain,even after it's been flagged/reported.
_________________
Feel Free to Check Out My Threads

https://www.forumophilia.com/topic240285.html Hot Milfs
https://www.forumophilia.com/topic238675.html Dressed/Undressed
https://www.forumophilia.com/topic238676.html Sexy Teens
https://www.forumophilia.com/topic209454.html Bj's and Facials
https://www.forumophilia.com/topic281461.html HC Pics
https://www.forumophilia.com/topic289173.html Drunk Girls+Flashers

many users use argument that ul/to is old and stable. yes, they are old and know how to survive but it doesn't mean that owners of this host can do everything they want.
also don't forget many users can't download using premium account too, just because many providers are blocking uploaded, also uploaded blocked some locations. we have replies above which prove that

I voted yes. This filehost was very good few years ago as for uploaders, as for webmasters. But they went to a wrong way with limiting speed and blocking users / countries.

I might be being a bit naïve but if uploaded was so bad, in terms of getting people to download their material, why would the posters of material use it? Surely if so few people were using that service, they wouldn't bother to post on it. Therefore, as they are getting traffic using it, surely it should stay.

This site had issues before when the Oron thing happened and everyone was encouraged to use only that, which from a point of view of downloaders only needing one service, I could see the sense of, but the material providers went ape. I think a similar thing might happen. If those posters would only move their material to another site, I can't see a benefit.

I know a lot of threads on here where people have posted to other services, that yes free, take about four hours to download one file and then nothing for ages, so unless it is epic, I just don't visit that thread any more. I've seen posters I've followed for a while change their service, and I just stop downloading and look elsewhere. So in a way, the ones I do download here are ones I have a membership to like Keep, Rapid, Uploaded. And I've found all three very acceptable but Uploaded the best.

Again, this is only from a downloaders view point, so I might be wrong.