Gabrielle - Now 18

full Set


enjoy


dead link

Nice one! Thanks Friend12!

The more I think about it, the more I have to wonder if blaming the posting of the pics on forums and newsgroups is really to blame.

Let's be serious here, a good chunk of the internet girls are ripped and posted somewhere, and yet their sites continue to survive.

So, is it a case of no money, or perhaps Gab was simply uncomfortable doing the nude stuff (look at some of her pics, she looks uncomfortable at times) and simply decided to quit?
_________________

Burn wrote:

Her website has been updated to say she is a topless model now. The photog has simply seen the glory of nudity and the dollars it brings in. Its so simple to tage downloads on the fly and then cancel the sub for the people whose cpies of the pics end up on the net. Its done thousands of times a day, the tagging of the pictures that is. There is a hack for that, but thats another topic. The phtog is simply becoming greedy and the girsl are too old for his tastes anymore.

I fuckin LOVE THOSE TITTIES thanks

She's shutting down the site, pulling the plug.

junkdewd wrote:

It's the never-ending battle between the Internet users who think the photog is "greedy" for wanting to be paid for his work, and the photog who thinks the Internet users are "thiefs" for sharing out his work on forums and the Usenet.

I really can't muster up a lot of hate for either side, and have been in both sets of shoes. As a photog I think a photog does deserve to get paid for at least SOME of the work he does, and the bitching gets a little deep about that at times; and also as a photog I think a photog should expect at least SOME of his work to get shared out for free on Forums and the Usenet in a hopefully limited fashion, which can actually be a good thing in generating buzz and interest and getting people to want more where that came from.

Fulls sets and especially full site dumps, I think are very bad form; but at the same time I think it's a waste of a web entrepreneur's time to try to chase down every stray photo that ends up anywhere out there to try to squeeze an extra buck or two out of it.

Bottom line, each camp should give the other some slack.

ciggy wrote:

I think he is simply a crybaby. There are thousands of sites on the web that are profitable and I see their pictures on the web and usenet every day. This guy, had the all around opportunity to run his business as he saw fit, and that was into the ground. Now that he failed, he wants to blame the internet users. Ive said it before, there are ways to track the pics. Sure, savvy users are gonna bypass it. But this is his fault for stepping back and whining instead of being proactive until he failed and needed someone to blame. I tried on 4 dfferent occasions to sbscribe to gabes first archive site. Theg guy refused to take a payment and allow me to subscrive for any reason. So, I didnt sbscribe to model-gabe either. He obviously ddnt undersand I wnated to give him the money he so readily desires now that his models have grown too old for his personal tastes.

Friend 12.Thanks. And more.

junkdewd wrote:

My point exactly

While I will admit that sharers and leeches take away money from a website, the website owner needs to realise that there are people out there willing to pay money to join a site if it has good regularly updated material.

He came, he saw, he failed. Sure sharers and leeches took a bit of his money, but he needs to accept a bit of responsibility as well for not providing enough content to keep people interested and entice new members.
_________________

Thank you for these pics and much appreciated.

It's a crying shame that the plug has been pulled. Just as her sets were getting hot and interesting.

Hopefully, she'll pop up (or out) again somewhere in the future with a new site.

We can but hope and pray.

REPOST LAST SET


dead link

Friend12 wrote:

Thanks for the post !!!

cute girl, but I fear that she will never loose the baby fat...

otherwise , she has a lovely face.

Burn wrote:
It's been posted before that Gabrielle seems to dislike the nude stuff, since she hardly smiles when she's topless. I find it hard to believe that a girl who's been photographed in the most tiny and see-trough thongs since she was 14 would have problems with nudity. Seeing her sets it really seemed inevitable for her to finally show it all.

However I understand there was a new guy (photographer?) and maybe she wasn't comfortable with him. But I really doubt that she'd mind showing her pussy for real instead of showing her pussy in a sheer thong (especially after doing that for the past 4 years).

If every single set and every single update is widely available for free then of course the site is going to suffer. Only the most loyal fans would pay for what they could get for free. No subscriptions = no money. I don't think the webmaster is being greedy at all, he's just running a business. You can't run a viable business when nobody has to pay for your product.

Personally, I would have been happy to see a lot less of Gabrielle's sets available if it meant that her site would stay in business.