Author
Twist
I'm probably spamming
Added: Aug 12, 2008 4:19 pm
Shadowman wrote:
Sorry guys but my internet has been down for the last few days so I haven't been able to act on any of the recent posts. Give me a chance to get up to speed on what's been happening around here lately and I'll address them.


no issue it happens.
dj_erotica
Poster
Added: Aug 13, 2008 4:26 pm
www.myupload.dk perhaps?

porn allowed!
very fast downloadspeed also for freeuser
filesizelimit 250mb unregistered-400mb registered
no timelimits for uploads
very easy to handle for freeuser(click and downloading at once)
http://www.myupload.dk/faq/#12

...and what`s the problem here with filefactory what i can read in this thread?
it`s the most professional hostservice in my opinium!
i use filefactory as premiumversion-the account management is much better than rapidshare
and megaupload and megaerotic needing also in premiumversion this silly toolbar for fast upload and faster download-
concentrating 98-99% to rapidshare is not the key! Rolling Eyes
tugaguy
I'm probably spamming
Added: Aug 15, 2008 5:31 pm
dj_erotica wrote:

...and what`s the problem here with filefactory what i can read in this thread?
it`s the most professional hostservice in my opinium!
i use filefactory as premiumversion-the account management is much better than rapidshare
and megaupload and megaerotic needing also in premiumversion this silly toolbar for fast upload and faster download-
concentrating 98-99% to rapidshare is not the key! Rolling Eyes


I totally agree with dj_erotica! Seems the only problem with FF here is that, it pays the uploader. Well, I consider that a little incentive. I have now premium FF and made 30$ in one month. Allows me to buy RS accounts. RS is very good for download, if you have a premium. But has no file manager system. It gets very confusing. And those link lists... forget it!! Confused
My upload speed is very low. It takes me a lot of time to upload to one service. And I'm not giving up on FF. So, if FF is not allowed, remove MegaUpload from the list already!! It also pays money and it's much more dangerous!
Please, reconsider FileFactory... Crying or Very sad
mattstan
VIP club member
Added: Aug 15, 2008 9:01 pm
I'd like to submit http://www.jpghosting.com/ to be investigated as an approved image hoster.

I've been using it for 3 years and found it very reliable and fast. One of the best things about it is that it allows direct linking within IMG tags so you aren't **** just to use thumbs with links to view the images on the host site like so many hosters, eg. Imagevenue.

Another bonus is it is really fast, much, much faster than almost any hoster I've seen or used. You can also upload images in a zip file which really saves time.

Non-registered users have a limit of 5 images per day, beyond that it has a small fee, £1 month unlimited pic hosting, £0.50 300 images a day, or £0.25 100 images a day. I have unlimited and think it's a small price to pay for such an excellent host and it's a lot cheaper than rapidshare.

Thanks very much guys.
maninguio
I'm probably spamming
Added: Aug 17, 2008 1:45 pm
How about http://www.myimgallery.com

This pic host site allows all kind of legal adult pics.
wraith
Respected Poster
Added: Aug 17, 2008 3:19 pm
mattstan wrote:
I'd like to submit http://www.jpghosting.com/ to be investigated as an approved image hoster.

I've been using it for 3 years and found it very reliable and fast. One of the best things about it is that it allows direct linking within IMG tags so you aren't **** just to use thumbs with links to view the images on the host site like so many hosters, eg. Imagevenue.

Another bonus is it is really fast, much, much faster than almost any hoster I've seen or used. You can also upload images in a zip file which really saves time.

I tried investigating this site today -- it first came back with an empty white page, and then when I tried again later it eventually just timed out. Not a good first impression, though I am generally in favor of adding a pic host that allows direct link to the full image.


Quote:
Non-registered users have a limit of 5 images per day, beyond that it has a small fee, £1 month unlimited pic hosting, £0.50 300 images a day, or £0.25 100 images a day. I have unlimited and think it's a small price to pay for such an excellent host and it's a lot cheaper than rapidshare.

This, however, makes me less enthusiastic about it, even if it were working, however. I assume those are limits on uploads, not downloads (a download limit is an instant showstopper for a place hosting previews), but it's also the only pic host we'd have on our list with a pay limit like that. I'm not sure if we should be endorsing that design for our preview hosts, though of course I'm not the mod responsible for adding to the list.
wraith
Respected Poster
Added: Aug 17, 2008 3:23 pm
As long as I'm here, I'd like to suggest the following link protector:

http://linksave.in/

Features it has that nothing else on the list has: automatic mirror handling (if a file is deleted from the main link list, it will automatically replace the first link list you give it with the second, third, etc.) and support for RSDF/CCF/DLC download link container systems.
mattstan
VIP club member
Added: Aug 18, 2008 10:44 pm
Hi Wraith - thanks for taking a look.

mattstan wrote:
I'd like to submit http://www.jpghosting.com/ to be investigated as an approved image hoster.

I've been using it for 3 years and found it very reliable and fast. One of the best things about it is that it allows direct linking within IMG tags so you aren't **** just to use thumbs with links to view the images on the host site like so many hosters, eg. Imagevenue.

Another bonus is it is really fast, much, much faster than almost any hoster I've seen or used. You can also upload images in a zip file which really saves time.
wraith wrote:
I tried investigating this site today -- it first came back with an empty white page, and then when I tried again later it eventually just timed out. Not a good first impression, though I am generally in favor of adding a pic host that allows direct link to the full image.

Unlucky that you had a problem. I very rarely have problems with accessing the site. In comparison many many times I used the FTP upload feature of imagevenue and after waiting for the upload to finish the site then failed to give me the links. jpghosting has always been much more reliable - that's why I started using it and pay the £1 month fee, I wouldn't pay if it wasn't more relaible and quicker to mass upload (upload a zip of pics rather than using FTP).

mattstan wrote:
Non-registered users have a limit of 5 images per day, beyond that it has a small fee, £1 month unlimited pic hosting, £0.50 300 images a day, or £0.25 100 images a day. I have unlimited and think it's a small price to pay for such an excellent host and it's a lot cheaper than rapidshare.

wraith wrote:
This, however, makes me less enthusiastic about it, even if it were working, however. I assume those are limits on uploads, not downloads (a download limit is an instant showstopper for a place hosting previews), but it's also the only pic host we'd have on our list with a pay limit like that. I'm not sure if we should be endorsing that design for our preview hosts, though of course I'm not the mod responsible for adding to the list.

There's no download limit. I agree jpghosting is of limited benefit unless you subscribe. But I don't think it should be discounted just because it is a subscriber service. Rapidshare, megaupload, etc. are endoursed and they are feature limited to non-members. Most (or at least a hell of a lot) of forumophilia users have a rapidshare account. I'm not saying that our forum members should be encouraged to use jpghosting.com but that it should be a site that can be used by members who wish to pay the modest fee (as little as 10% of rapidshare's cost) and those of us who already use it can continue to do so (that's my principal concern by the way, me being able to continue to use it).

Thanks and regards,

mattstan
Abraxas
Retired Legend
Added: Aug 18, 2008 10:58 pm
tugaguy,
I have removed the link to your blog from your profile. It is against this forum`s rules to advertise any site in any manner, here on our forum.
Smukke Charlie
Respected Poster
Added: Aug 19, 2008 9:44 am
I have just noticed this replay from Abraxas and it perhaps time to make a update in the permitted list:

@beta2008x
We are careful about which hosting sites we allow to be posted here. However, after reconsidering your position, I will add that host you are using (dumppix) to this forum`s list of accepted hosting sites.

The thread are:
https://www.forumophilia.com/topic49957-105.html
Shadowman
Retired Legend
Added: Aug 20, 2008 8:57 am
I received a PM suggesting this host.

http://www.imghost.sk/up/

Unfortunately I don't speak Russian so I can't really check it out.
Shadowman
Retired Legend
Added: Aug 20, 2008 9:01 am
Smukke Charlie wrote:
I have just noticed this replay from Abraxas and it perhaps time to make a update in the permitted list:

@beta2008x
We are careful about which hosting sites we allow to be posted here. However, after reconsidering your position, I will add that host you are using (dumppix) to this forum`s list of accepted hosting sites.


I see that dumppix has been added to the permitted list.
Monkey D. Ruffy
Very Respected VIP club member
Added: Aug 20, 2008 10:06 am
Shadowman wrote:
I received a PM suggesting this host.

http://www.imghost.sk/up/

Unfortunately I don't speak Russian so I can't really check it out.


I think that's Slovakian.

Tested and it seems fine (allows hotlinking full size pics).

What do you think about this one:

http://images.oddassy.net/

Full size hotlinking or thumbnails allowed:

screenshot screenshot

Monkey D. Ruffy
Shadowman
Retired Legend
Added: Aug 20, 2008 10:17 am
Monkey D. Ruffy wrote:
Shadowman wrote:
I received a PM suggesting this host.

http://www.imghost.sk/up/

Unfortunately I don't speak Russian so I can't really check it out.


I think that's Slovakian.


I stand corrected. My worry is that I don't know if they allow pornographic images because I can't read their terms of service.


Monkey D. Ruffy wrote:
What do you think about this one:

http://images.oddassy.net/

Full size hotlinking or thumbnails allowed:

screenshot screenshot

Their terms of service say that they don't allow pornographic images so I'm loathe to include it in the list.

There seems to be a problem with Cocopic. The thumbnails I've posted with it are dead and I can't access their site. They may no longer exist. If things don't change in the next couple of days it needs to be removed from the list.
Shadowman
Retired Legend
Added: Aug 21, 2008 9:04 am
As to the last sentence on my post above Cocopic no longer exists so I'm removing it from the permitted list. Shame that. It was a good thumbnail host and I know a lot of members here have been using it.