ayebite wrote:Look: I just don't like that I have to BUY me traffic now. I waited my 3 or 4 days in the past and started another download session.
You see: sharing with rapidshare (getting points) enabled me to share more (traffic for download). THAT has changed now. has it not?
You don't have to buy traffic, when needed it's done automatically by default - as long as you have enough rapids.
Now you can even use traffic which would be "wasted" before ( e.g. if you weren't downloading for a week).
No kind of rewards from a hoster ... so what? It's nice to get these goodies, but is it necessary for you in order to upload? Can someone share stuff without being paid for?
Most serious MU uploader have files larger than 100 MB - do they get rewards?
Why should download-traffic be necessary for uploading?
I've seen the RS-changes and i wasn't very happy in the beginning, but the current situation is IMHO better than most other services.
I got your point
RS doesn't pay you -> you are pissed because you don't get the download-traffic you'd want.
All about the money
Making $$ with uploading stolen goods - is that the meaning of sharing?
Why do the most accepted and most reliable file-sharing hoster NOT need to pay their user?
Why are some user uploading only to hosts, which pay them? In the interest of the downloder?
If you chose to upload to pay-hoster, because you just want to grab some cash - do it.
If you like to share stuff, which includes that the files can easily be downloaded, chose the best hoster for that.
These options seem to exclude each other.
This forum allows three different file-hosts - everyone should be able to chose a preferred:
- making $
- "customizing" /use according to needs (which needs some words to describe and read)
- easy and simple (not needing to say much about it doesn't mean that something is wrong)