Author
milktop
Respected Poster
Added: Jan 02, 2010 3:39 pm
Seen the last two and I'm in two minds.

With the glass half full approach, it is great that they are listening to their subscribers and have added the warm up and reduced the crowds. This allows more of the action to be seen. Also as others have said less girls means more chance the girls get into it.

But looking at glass half empty. I hope they are not looking to run PH down. Doing the above certainly means spending less. The warm ups are interesting but not worth a week on their own, if they keep them in it means one less party a year. I would be haappy if they were only shown every few parties or even better added on a different day as bonus material.

As for the smaller parties. Less girls means, less booze to buy, less waiters, bar staff, cameramen. I also suspect there could be less strippers. We shall see with the next couple of weeks.
OhOhAte
I'm probably spamming
Added: Jan 05, 2010 8:00 pm
What the fuck? Is this party just 2 parts? Looks like pretty much all the action is done by the end of this episode, unless they've got something else in store for us now that the money shots are done.
desh
Poster
Added: Jan 06, 2010 5:04 pm
There's been some cumshots in the last party ?
milktop
Respected Poster
Added: Jan 06, 2010 8:42 pm
Yes it looks like this was only a two parter.

In some ways that is good, as I think that means they are just trying out new format. If they were trying to cut costs I would have expected them to stretch it out to the usual 4 weeks.
milktop
Respected Poster
Added: Jan 10, 2010 5:30 pm
New review party is up on Barbara's blog. In one of the pictures it shows Dennis with a handcamera, which is another thing that the members have been requesting.

So it looks like they are trying other things, which is a good thing.
svetter16
I'm probably spamming
Added: Jan 12, 2010 1:09 pm
hopefully the site stays afloat
OhOhAte
I'm probably spamming
Added: Jan 19, 2010 3:28 pm
I was going through older PH episodes and I found one that I can't seem to place with the rest of its party. It's the episode from 2004-01-28. Does anyone know what party this goes with? Or is it just a 1 episode party?

Thanks.
gglang
Respected Poster
Added: Jan 21, 2010 12:15 am
OhOhAte wrote:
I was going through older PH episodes and I found one that I can't seem to place with the rest of its party. It's the episode from 2004-01-28. Does anyone know what party this goes with? Or is it just a 1 episode party?

Thanks.


I believe that episode is a loner - I've looked everywhere that carry the past PH episodes, and they all have the same. It's too bad, there wasn't more coverage, cause its better good for an older PH.
OhOhAte
I'm probably spamming
Added: Jan 21, 2010 2:27 pm
Thanks. It is indeed too bad, looks like there could have been some good stuff both before and after that episode.

gglang wrote:
OhOhAte wrote:
I was going through older PH episodes and I found one that I can't seem to place with the rest of its party. It's the episode from 2004-01-28. Does anyone know what party this goes with? Or is it just a 1 episode party?

Thanks.


I believe that episode is a loner - I've looked everywhere that carry the past PH episodes, and they all have the same. It's too bad, there wasn't more coverage, cause its better good for an older PH.
milktop
Respected Poster
Added: Jan 25, 2010 7:44 am
I could not remember the party you were talking about so had a look in my back collection - purely for research purposes Very Happy

At the time I downloaded all the early episodes I was sure there was other parts to that party but all the dates were mixed up. Now after looking again, your right it seems like a one off - shame as it looked like a good early party!
gglang
Respected Poster
Added: Jan 28, 2010 9:19 am
I guess its true -- they're opening the year with a 3 parter. Thats the look of it from the latest episode. It was nothing special. Sad
gglang
Respected Poster
Added: Jan 28, 2010 9:20 am
I guess its true -- they're opening the year with a 3 parter. Thats the look of it from the latest episode. It was nothing special. Sad
gglang
Respected Poster
Added: Feb 03, 2010 1:22 am
You think Gina Killmer is going make a difference?
gglang
Respected Poster
Added: Feb 13, 2010 3:19 am
Gina hasn't been as aggressive as she's been in the past -besides M.C ing, she's helped a few girls expose their breasts - nothing outrageous, rather tame. The photography has gotten worst, with all the strippers wandering around with cams - I guess they need a little more time getting used to shot composition. The crew now are dressed like clowns - from what Barbara said in her blog - supposedly it gives the audience a cheerful atmosphere. I believe, its to masquerade the crews true identity. So far not a bad two episodes.
gglang
Respected Poster
Added: Feb 27, 2010 9:03 am
What started as a promising beginning, ended in a typical 'run of the a mill' PH month. Even Gina looked somewhat bored -- the photography and editing was bad. Too many close ups -- somewhat claustrophobic, especially when they flash a close-up. You didn't know who's doing who. Sad