EastBayNSA wrote:But that wasn't nearly full-on porn. I'm not saying it wasn't wonderful, it was, but if you've been here long enough, you'd have read that for a long time, many people were upset that she "teased" for way too long, and there were many complaints in this forum that she could have had a great career (i.e. like Wifey) if she would only take the plunge. So I'm not the only one that would have loved to have seen her go all the way.
She's retired, she's gone and now all we have are memories, which is nice, I'm not questioning that.
But there have been many of her videos that have been posted in here that have been re-edited, and no one's complained about that. So not a lot of a purists in here, re-editing her videos has had full support in this forum.
I guess it's all about just how much editing one is willing to tolerate. As for me, I'm more than willing to see what the new tech can provide, especially with an imaginative true fan of Christina's.
She's gone now, and she provided us with great fantasy. And since this is all fantasy, why not we go the extra step since she never did?
Mainly because editing and patching different videos together is WAY different than putting her face on a body that's not her. Patching together videos is still her just edited while the other is a fake video that is only her in face.
It is becoming obvious you have issues telling the difference. If you get off on fakes then more power to you but here they are unacceptable as you have already seen by some of the replies. Continuing to argue your point will only end up getting you banned by one of the mods when they get tired of it.
I have been trolling these forums for MANY years before posting some as I simply don't have the spare time. I work 70+ hours a week usually.