Since when is it a "flame" to respond to members being called lazy
saxonviolins wrote:nobody bothered to respond to this.
or dishonest because they are so obsessive-compulsive (negative characterization) that they must have something to add but are deliberately withholding that information
saxonviolins wrote:all the people here with massive video collections have no means of organizing them. (I find this hard to believe due to the extent and "anality", for lack of a better word of some people's collections here)
or that they are selfish, and only give when they receive first?
saxonviolins wrote:majority of members here could care less about the posts in the "general chat" section since there is no porn.
That's not a flame, it's defending yourself
against a flame. I guess we will have to agree to disagree. Posting a meaningless comment saying "I don't know" is not polite IMO.
As for your second post, thanks for the information. But why did you not bother to include this in your
first post, I wonder? You called out members for not responding and made accusations that members had information they weren't sharing...while you had information and did not share it in your post.
As for the programs you mentioned, how do they work, and how slow do they operate? Do they scan existing DVDs, and how long does it take to scan a full disc in your experience?
What does your program do with cryptically named files? Does it give you the opportunity to open a movie named, say, "23" and then edit the file's entry in the database to add performer, etc. info? And you mentioned crashes with other programs - does ACDSee crash, or has it been reliable? Is it a CPU hog while running, like ITunes, or is it quick and RAM friendly?