Author
stallion
Good Poster
Added: Feb 02, 2007 5:19 pm
You guys recall this girl? You may have seen her posted in Elibom's virginsphotos topic. As you can see, she's sprouted some breasts. It's obviously a more recent shoot, but from where? The picture has no logo. Has anyone seen the set or know anything? I've seen only 12 samples.

screenshot screenshot screenshot

Unkown Set - 12 Low-Rez Samples:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/b6rh8l

VirginPhotos Set - Re-Upped:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/rtryc7
stallion
Good Poster
Added: Feb 02, 2007 5:56 pm
Right after posting this, I found samples from another set of hers. This time it has a logo... Amour Angels. Would love to get the complete set. Anyone?

screenshot

Amour Angels - 20 Samples:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/i9tqhi
johony
I'm probably spamming
Added: Feb 03, 2007 10:06 am
She seems to have grown pubes too....are you absolutely sure they're both the same person? There are slight differences with both of their faces.
windmere
Poster
Added: Feb 03, 2007 12:07 pm
johony wrote:
She seems to have grown pubes too....are you absolutely sure they're both the same person? There are slight differences with both of their faces.


yes, it's the same girls, the first set, virginsphoto is actually a B*D C0*mp@ny set with the tags hidden under the new virginsphoto tags. If you look really close, she's not shaved, she just doesn't have pubes yet.

Im not sure she should be here. But im not the staff
johony
I'm probably spamming
Added: Feb 04, 2007 12:02 am
windmere wrote:
johony wrote:
She seems to have grown pubes too....are you absolutely sure they're both the same person? There are slight differences with both of their faces.
If you look really close, she's not shaved, she just doesn't have pubes yet.

That's what i noticed first thing.

But i suppose it's easy to slap on a "18 USC 2257" tag on the front of their site.
oshisd
I'm probably spamming
Added: Feb 06, 2007 7:52 pm
i don't think they are the same
Black Dahlia
I'm probably spamming
Added: Feb 10, 2007 8:49 pm
I am absolutely, positively sure these are pictures of the same model(unless of course she has an identical twin) because I plugged them into the 99.9985% accurate facial biometrics program running on my US69 Gigagacore-5Kg analog computer.

And windmere is 100% correct:


windmere wrote:
johony wrote:
She seems to have grown pubes too....are you absolutely sure they're both the same person? There are slight differences with both of their faces.


yes, it's the same girls, the first set, virginsphoto is actually a B*D C0*mp@ny set with the tags hidden under the new virginsphoto tags. If you look really close, she's not shaved, she just doesn't have pubes yet.

Im not sure she should be here. But im not the staff
johony
I'm probably spamming
Added: Feb 11, 2007 4:37 am
Black Dahlia wrote:
I am absolutely, positively sure these are pictures of the same model(unless of course she has an identical twin) because I plugged them into the 99.9985% accurate facial biometrics program running on my US69 Gigagacore-5Kg analog computer.

And windmere is 100% correct:


windmere wrote:
johony wrote:
She seems to have grown pubes too....are you absolutely sure they're both the same person? There are slight differences with both of their faces.


yes, it's the same girls, the first set, virginsphoto is actually a B*D C0*mp@ny set with the tags hidden under the new virginsphoto tags. If you look really close, she's not shaved, she just doesn't have pubes yet.

Im not sure she should be here. But im not the staff

Yeah, i've come to the conclusion that they're both the same person.

I noticed that her most recent set is from JustTeenSite, so obviously shes revolving around studios. And names too.
natali
I'm probably spamming
Added: Feb 17, 2007 12:30 am
The first pic is from BD and it should NOT be here, she is way too young.