Author
Winterman
I'm probably spamming
Added: May 07, 2013 9:18 am
For filehosting there is an "allowed" list, so that is pretty clear, but for imagehosting the list says "recommended".

Basically that means that I am allowed to use other hosts, but is that really the case?
JB Wannabe
Godfather of Forumophilia
Added: May 07, 2013 11:49 am
Winterman wrote:
For filehosting there is an "allowed" list, so that is pretty clear, but for imagehosting the list says "recommended".

Basically that means that I am allowed to use other hosts, but is that really the case?


Yes, that is really the case.

But if you use some shady host with lots of pop ups and other annoying features, that host will not be allowed. And trust me, people WILL complain. Laughing
Winterman
I'm probably spamming
Added: May 08, 2013 9:04 am
Thanks for the answer.

So what about imagetwist or imagechilli?

They look fine to me, but I am using Firefox with some add-ons that prevent shady behaviour.
JB Wannabe
Godfather of Forumophilia
Added: May 11, 2013 1:15 am
Both of those are currently allowed.