Should We Allow People To Add Mirror Hosts To Other Peoples Full Movie Posts?
Yes
61%
No
38%
Author
JB Wannabe
Godfather of Forumophilia
Added: Nov 07, 2012 9:39 pm
Roughly 50% of all complaints we receive is from the single movie sections, FULL MOVIES - SINGLE MOVIE THREADS ONLY.

https://www.forumophilia.com/index.php

Someone will repost a movie and the original poster(OP) will complain. The duplicate movie is then sent to the trash. If the original movie is posted in LS, for example, and you only have a UL account, then you are likely to go elsewhere to download the movie.

So here's my simple idea. Anyone can repost a movie in the ORIGINAL THREAD as long as they use a different file host. Duplicate threads will be merged with the original thread. So if someone posts Pigtailed Virgins #69 with Lucky and Depositfile links, someone else can then add in RG, RS, HF, etc..to the post. But they MUST include their own screenshots of the movie.

I have not talked to the admin about this yet. I want to first hear from those who post full movies and those who download them to see if this is something people would like.

I don't upload nor do I download full movies, so I won't be the least bit offended or upset with any opinion posted here. So please do post your opinions no matter what they are.

Thanks,

JB

P.S. In case anyone is wondering, changes were made to the board set up awhile back so mods can no longer sticky threads.
Soultaker1309
I'm probably spamming
Added: Nov 07, 2012 10:06 pm
I posted in FULL MOVIES - SINGLE MOVIE THREADS ONLY, and I agree with your idea to allow reposting same movie using different file host. All users will be satisfied.
cabreado
Poster
Added: Nov 07, 2012 10:13 pm
Yes, but sometimes I got "no results found" before post a full movie I've searched. Also, moderators will need more time to find the post and chek it. Altought, it's a very good idea and I'm agree with you.

Regards Wink
Neverlands
I'm probably spamming
Added: Nov 08, 2012 12:30 am
I think NO Exclamation
PopPorn
Good Poster
Added: Nov 08, 2012 2:18 am
Nice idea and its followed on someother forum for some selected section.

Go JB Go, and its really appreciating you think about forums problems and try to find good solution
Diller
I'm probably spamming
Added: Nov 08, 2012 2:26 am
Neverlands wrote:
I think NO Exclamation


+1
as for me, it's not a good idea
_________________
Real Homemade Video|Anal Fuck | Amateur Photo | Blowjobs
Oronmaniak
Poster
Added: Nov 08, 2012 7:38 am
Very Bad Idea.
nitobe
Godfather of Grandfather of Forumophilia
Added: Nov 08, 2012 9:05 am
Adding a reply with mirror links to the original post is OK. I would just add 48 hours waiting period!

After 48 hours single post gets burried away anyway, so adding a reply with mirror links after that period would be fine both for original poster (his post gets to the first page again) and for people who wants to download from other host!

Also, clarification of the Mirror host rule is needed here: If the new links/post are on RG which is allowed only as a mirror - does that new post count as just "mirroring" or those RG links need to meet criteria as for any other post here!

My 2 cents!
_________________
Real Amateur Wives|Fun Fetish Films|Real Life Wives' Pictures
JB Wannabe
Godfather of Forumophilia
Added: Nov 08, 2012 1:14 pm
nitobe wrote:
Adding a reply with mirror links to the original post is OK. I would just add 48 hours waiting period!

After 48 hours single post gets burried away anyway, so adding a reply with mirror links after that period would be fine both for original poster (his post gets to the first page again) and for people who wants to download from other host!

Also, clarification of the Mirror host rule is needed here: If the new links/post are on RG which is allowed only as a mirror - does that new post count as just "mirroring" or those RG links need to meet criteria as for any other post here!

My 2c's!


I would be OK with a 48 hour rule. Often people are posting the same video at the same time so that one person's post is mere seconds ahead of the others. I end up feeling bad having to remove those posts but the rules are the rules.

And your point about threads getting another bump is a good one since most people don't go back many pages when they search a section.
JB Wannabe
Godfather of Forumophilia
Added: Nov 08, 2012 1:34 pm
Neverlands wrote:
I think NO Exclamation


I'm a bit surprised by this response. All of you who post full movies have had their posts tossed in the trash for duplication. Diller only has a few dozen but you have 406 things in the Trash at the moment. Not all of them are full movies but checking a few pages showed that at least 50% of them were. That's a lot of lost downloads all the way around. If my suggested rule was in place, none of those links would be in the Trash. Plus, how many times have there been when you wanted post a movie you had uploaded, but the current rule prohibited it because someone else had already posted it? If this rule was enacted, ALL of you regular posters would be able to post even MORE links than you currently can.

I'm also thinking of the bigger picture here. Due to the instability of file hosts, we have no idea who will next end up like MU/Oron, or when. Not only would it keep the board stronger in these sections, but when a file host does go down, those who don't use it will benefit from it since your alternate links, which currently are not allowed, are still working.

That's my additional 2 cents.
P.I.M.P.20
Very Respected VIP club member
Added: Nov 09, 2012 2:26 pm
YES,I like the idea of adding a mirrors to the full movies threads while using other filehost.
PopPorn
Good Poster
Added: Nov 17, 2012 11:55 am
Some cheater are on forum, editing post and report others one and claimed to be the 1st poster :S


PM'ed two mods, no anwer.

If this is the way, old members can apply it very easily, Just we can edit our old topic with new one and report the new topic :S
nitobe
Godfather of Grandfather of Forumophilia
Added: Nov 17, 2012 7:46 pm
If the post is edited it can be clearly seen on the bottom of the page who, when and why edited the post, so such things should not be a problem for the moderators!

edit: See my previous post here and you will see that I edited it around the same time I posted this one (I changed "My 2c's" into "My two cents"

At the bottom of this page edit time should have been visible also, since I edited this post also, but if it is edited in 10-15 minutes after sending original message, no edit note will be visible!
_________________
Real Amateur Wives|Fun Fetish Films|Real Life Wives' Pictures
JB Wannabe
Godfather of Forumophilia
Added: Nov 18, 2012 2:15 pm
nitobe wrote:
If the post is edited it can be clearly seen on the bottom of the page who, when and why edited the post, so such things should not be a problem for the moderators!

edit: See my previous post here and you will see that I edited it around the same time I posted this one (I changed "My 2c's" into "My two cents"

At the bottom of this page edit time should have been visible also, since I edited this post also, but if it is edited in 10-15 minutes after sending original message, no edit note will be visible!


Thanks for pointing that out to people. When I edit someone else's post, it does not show up. When I edit old posts of my own, some times it does and some times it does not. But for most people, what you explained is exactly what happens when they edit older posts.

If someone reports a movie already posted and the post has been recently edited, that edited post is what I will send to the Trash, not the reported one. And if I catch someone doing it multiple times, I will ban and remove all of their threads, which is not hard to do with the mod tools we have.
PopPorn
Good Poster
Added: Nov 19, 2012 3:21 pm
JB Wannabe wrote:
nitobe wrote:
If the post is edited it can be clearly seen on the bottom of the page who, when and why edited the post, so such things should not be a problem for the moderators!

edit: See my previous post here and you will see that I edited it around the same time I posted this one (I changed "My 2c's" into "My two cents"

At the bottom of this page edit time should have been visible also, since I edited this post also, but if it is edited in 10-15 minutes after sending original message, no edit note will be visible!


Thanks for pointing that out to people. When I edit someone else's post, it does not show up. When I edit old posts of my own, some times it does and some times it does not. But for most people, what you explained is exactly what happens when they edit older posts.

If someone reports a movie already posted and the post has been recently edited, that edited post is what I will send to the Trash, not the reported one. And if I catch someone doing it multiple times, I will ban and remove all of their threads, which is not hard to do with the mod tools we have.



thnQ