Some annoying things about lesbian porn

I love lesbian porn but there are some things which really annoy me. I have outlined some of these before but here are a few more.

1) Bad camerawork. Spending far too much time with the camera on side view. Hardly none or not enough close-ups.

2) Chicks who decide, or are told, to wear massive earrings during sex. Especially annoying when you're trying to view the oral. The earrings keep dangling and getting in the way.

3) The long hair on their heads covering the oral action. Nothing can be seen. May as well be a soft core movie or scene.

4) Constant back of heads shots.

5) Slow motion or scenes in black and white with some frames missing. Absolutely stupid.

6) Chicks who take ages to get down to the scene. I find this a lot in Girlfriends movies where someone like Prinzzess will mess about for about 25 minutes, going so slow, you think she's gonna fall asleep. Or I am gonna fall asleep.

7) Chicks who are so obviously not into women, all they wanna do is get the scene done and head off home. They invariably spend most of the scene, rubbing themselves against the other chick and faking 'oh yeahs'.

Glad I got that off my chest.

Clearly you aren't watching the right lez action...

Abbydady;
i agree with all of your complaints. Having been a member of 5 other lesbian-oriented sites (Lezlove and Abby Winters are probably the best known); the Community Members have gone thru the same list of grievances as yourself.
I would add 3 more:
Firstus with the mostust:
read the damned definition of "Lesbian"!! Does it mention a guy breaking into the tryst, mid-vid? No!
If I wanted a bi-oriented vid; I'd watch one!!! in a nutshell "lesbian" is sex between 2 or more female humans, period(.) There's no male involvement. get any guys out of "lesbian" scenes (.)
Two:
Why is there a perception that any woman who is masturbating a l o n e and maybe using a toy; is a lesbian????? What???
Whose idea was that??? what nonsense....you've seen the bylines for these vids... or, don't advertise is as "lesbian". Simple? Should be
Tha-reeee:
few things in the porn world irritate me more than some dork director throwiing his ignorant mouth in between the lens of his camera, and the girl-girl action of interest. You've heard it waaaaayyyyy tooooo often: "Duh...hay, Beerice?! Lift op youse leg...no, de odder one...whatja mean it's not you leg???"....oh, god....
Four;
Ok, so, I lied saying 3...
I detest any camera person who never uses: a viewfinder, light meter or tripod.
Abby: If you can: just compare any episode of "Old and Young Lesbians" or "Ferro productions" with any scenes shot by Viv Thomas...I'm going to presume you already know what I'm referring to...

And Pook: you also have a valid point. However why not share info with us on the "better" or "lousy" sites? Thgat's the beauty of these Forums; spreading the info on quality/non=quality sites.
If either of you are interested, I can reply with (my impression, anyway) of a number of "lesbian" sites.

Abbydabby wrote:

That reminds me of the women in GGG.

Which studio was it that offered...I don't remember for sure...$1000 maybe.. to anybody who could "prove the orgasms weren't real"?

Same category of advertising gems as 9 out of 10 Doctors report.

Good lesbian porn is incredibly hot, too bad the stuff I enjoy is about 1 in 100 clips. The things that bother me are:

1. Posed, stiff movies where it's obviously 2 models trying to display themselves in an 'erotic' way. For me it's sexless and a random collection of body parts. I have the same problem with man/woman porn too.

2. No foreplay. I like the slow undressing and movement from kissing to more. Most videos skip that and try to get the clothes off as soon as possible, usually followed by the sexless gymanstics described in point 1.

3. Women who obviously don't find other women at all sexy. It's usually boring and can sometimes be a little sad.

To be honest there aren't many good videos out there. @bby w1nters have done some great stuff, especially as I like the pseudo-amateur style, and there are some good vids by other Australian sites, IFM and GOW. Viv Thomas are hit-or-miss to me.

skipper
there are some folks who think foreplay...and likely a "plot" as well... are waste of time in a porno flick. I don't. Porno is a lot about illusion and belief. I like a plot. Sex should not just pop out of empty space like the Big Bang (honest: no pun intended).

Abby Winters is probably the most objectively "true to life" site around, I presume GOW is another.
In some scenes, the ladies are honestly hot and affectionate for each other; and other scenes, one participant starts out gung-ho and ends up noticably disliking sex with her opposite.
to me, that's just human nature.
Kudos to AW for having the guts to release vids in the second category. It makes their truly hot lady/lady clips look even better.

Something I find as a real hoot is a few of the porno premises/titles:
such as:
"Teen Angel vs. Innocent Mature":
starring:
Teen Angel ( nina hartley) vs. Innocent (sinn sage)...

Oh, does the credulity ever get strained on those!