Question about the new rules

Users are given time to adapt to new rules, otherwise I can easily move the whole forum to archive.

It is now ten days since they new rules took effect and still there are a few users who continuing to break against thoes new rules

Sadly to say Stefan Effenberg you are fighting a lost cause.
I was pointing this out when I was an Admin of this site plus that I fought that another Admin here should not have two or possibly more accounts.
I will not reveal the name of that Admin since I have noticed one positive about him.
The Admin account is not posting any files only admin comments.

Anyway, as you can see I'm no longer an Admin here due to the disagrements I had with the siteowner on subjects like this.
_________________
[URL=http://www.casimages.com][/URL]

svinto wrote:
Wish I had something to add to this conversation but as usual, I got nothing important to say.


Ah well, that's me...

Besides:

Bit late perhaps, but well ment.

I think that this is the fact.

- If you are one of the FF guys = You don´t have to follow the rules.

- If you not are one of the FF guys = Follow the rules and post your stuff in the archive section (if not we move your threads there)

Stefan Effenberg wrote:

Sorry, but your facts really aren't the facts.

Not too long ago, I posted half a dozen sets in my thread late in the evening my time. I then posted another half a dozen early in the following morning, again my time. Unfortunately, both posts were made in the same day as far as the board was concerned. A certain someone, who will go nameless, reported it. And I got summoned to the principal's office, so to speak. I explained what happened and even posted what had happened so people didn't think I was getting special treatment. I gave myself a warning and banned myself from posting for 24 hours. I have never perma banned long time members who makes a similar mistake. In fact, I routinely 'clean up' people's threads so they are in compliance rather than just taking the easy route of deleting the extra posts or sending the whole thing to the archives. I have also temporarily banned people from posting in their thread for a few days.

You are right about some threads being moved to the archives. If you look at that section, you will notice there are now a lot of mods there. Once people fix their mistakes, they are free to contact one of those mods with a link to their post showing that it now follows the rules and can be moved back.

JB

16Th January and there are still several FF users who continuing to breaking against the new site rule no 1a.
From my point of view so in 14 days all should have adapted this new rule.
Thoes who have not adapted the new rules are all "one of the inner circle FF guys".

Real real bad

I am a small poster with lot of warnings. Here I am replying this thread with some information.
I have posted a very new movie hare which cover image is not available in the internet on that time. As its a download.

I haven't found any rule in forumophilia that cover image is must for posting movies. However its my movie link, posted on 4th november 2010
https://www.forumophilia.com/

You can see here that my thread is not only moved to archive but also I got a infraction.

But please see this movie link, may be you got shocked.
https://www.forumophilia.com/topic154855.html

He doesn't care for any covers or any infos. just screenshot and link


I haven't any problem with the moderator, but have problem that I got infractions for not only have a cover image as its not available, which also not written in any rules that its mandatory. Two big movies released today Slave To The Sultan, Real Wife Stories - Holly Rice . I have all informations but don't have its cover image because its not available anywhere currently. So can't able to post this movies.BUT IF YOU ARE A STAFF IN THIS FORUM THEN NOT TO BE HAVE AFRAID LIKE ME.

Stefan Effenberg wrote:

According to the main page, we "have 280210 registered users". Naturally, not all of them post. If just 1/10 of 1% of the membership post, and several of that .1% still aren't following all of the rules, is that really something worth anyone getting too worked up over?

Of course, it's really more than "several". When I logged on yesterday there was over 100 video violations. And almost none of them could be considered "one of the inner circle FF guys", whatever that exactly means. Just look in the Archive section if you don't believe me. What about picture violatoins? My, my, my. there was 0 picture violations reported. Hmmm.

There is no question that people posting videos are the ones breaking the new rules 99% of the time. OK, maybe I'm being harsh. It could be closer to 98% of the time. I can't begin to imagine how frustrated I would become if people in my corners of the forum were breaking the rules to this extent. My dear laptop probably would have taken a vacation through my picture window by now if I had to deal with the nonsense the video mods have to. In other words, the video mods in particular have had their hands full but this will all get sorted out in due time.

I'll see you in a week!

TheKillerMan wrote:

The reason you were probably singled out is that someone probably reported your post. The cover might not have been available at the time you posted the video but it was shortly after. If you do a g00gle search of the movie title followed by "porn movie" without the quotes, you find these covers at the very top of the search:




I looked at several full length movie threads and all of them included the covers. Maybe this is an unwritten rule that everyone is expected to follow. I don't have a fast enough connection to dl full movies so it's not something I've ever paid attention to. Personally, I think that should be a rule and I will add it to my list of things to pm Papillon about.

JB Wannabe wrote:

Ok I haven't post the cover as it not available on that time. I got a infraction. But what about this ?
https://www.forumophilia.com/topic154855.html

Why don't you guys not move this thread , or why don't you guys can't give any infraction to him. Because he is a moderator ? If their is not rule written in anywhere currently, how can be you guys gives infractions to users. Do you want users to be read and follow yours minds rules also. We are not God, so that we can read minds.

JB Wannabe wrote:

ROFLMAO, can we test that theory? stand in front of this cannon and we will see JB.

TheKillerMan wrote:

He has never followed a rule on any forum I have seen him post in, and you are right some get away with murder. Its ok JB, we do see and understand.

Its not the rules that are the problem its the people who interpret silly rules, rules are only as good as the person who wrote them and in the instance of the title rule, well the whole issue becomes subjective and allows the Mods and admin to remove any threat that may threaten their permanent Oron users. I was moved for several reasons, thread title and duplicate posts. If posters posted to a decent host that allowed many downloads without hours of waiting time then things would move smoothly, If it wasn't a case of supporting Orin then in all honesty the admins would demand a service host like Mirorcreator or Upload Mirrors and demand at least 12 hosts be selected.

wake up and smell the roses, this forum is for people who want to capitalise from Oron and they dont care who they screw over, get used to it, roll with it and live with it. When you understand that this place becomes easier to understand and live in. Play the game or get the f*ck off the boat is how they think now days. Least the original owner GS had a heart.

TheKillerMan wrote:

If I were a mod in the video section, I would give him a infraction just for you!

The proper response in this situation would have been to contact Papillon and in a calm and polite manner ask him about this. I get 'attacked' on a regular basis in emails and pms for things I never even did nor have any control over. So I can't imagine how many of those types of things he gets as the admin. Probably a lot. Which is why the calm and polite route is the way to go. Maybe he would have looked at it and said "oops" and fixed it. At the very least, you should add in the covers before contacting him about it. How long it takes him to respond, of course, depends on how long of a 'to do' list he has.

JB

sir_darkstar wrote:

Shortly after I started posting here, I was banned by Svinto for using.....drum roll please.....Sharebee! If he hadn't had an email address listed in his profile, I probably still would be banned. And that's the main reason I keep a public email account here.

If you go through old threads, you rarely will find any sort of multihost. There are a few back when they were allowed but most people used rapidshare. Why? Because of the rapidshare points! They used it to get free premium accounts. Those greedy bastards!

Do I really blame them? Hell no! Finding, downloading, sorting, uploading and posting porn takes time. Valuable time. Time that could be spent feeding the poor at a local soup kitchen. Do you have any idea how many starving ****ren there are out there because I chose to post porn? DO YOU?!?

Be honest, what do you think would have happened if at the height of rapidshare's prosperity, they had started to offer their premium users a portion of all the new memberships fees that their downloads generated? You don't really think that all of the rapidshare users would have sniffed and moved to megaupload, do you? If mere RS points were enough to entice them to primarily use rapdishare over all other hosts, including mulithosts, and wage 'delete wars' with each other like crack-fueled street gangs, getting paid a chunk of new membership dues would have been as popular as a beer truck tipping over in skid row!

There are some purists out there that only use multi hosts, but they mostly are on small and/or private boards. And HOORAY for them!!

As far as your thread goes, I just received confirmation from Forumophilia's Oron Inner Circle of Users, or FOIC U, that they had nothing to do with the complaints about your title. That was purely a coincidence, it seems. What a relief, eh?

But seriously, the video sections have very tough standards. And that's mostly due to so many people spamming them with the same videos over and over again. People bitch and complain about it all the time, which is why 99% of all threads in the Archives are video threads. And 99.9% of those are 100% oron threads. Trust me, the fact that you used MU probably had nothing to do with it. Just as Zwergi if his non-oron threads have been respected or not.

JB

JB Wannabe wrote:

But way back in the days, when the FOIC U was made of other, now old and retired people, many FOIC U-ers used to share RS-accounts as if the FOIC U's back then were a bunch of communists.
I never earned free account with my uploads (never figured out how to get them) but I was given over a dozen free accounts by other power-users.

Ow, those were the days...