A Sensible Suggestion

I've noticed some of the modelling sites discussions here over the past few days and it seems clear that some people are jumping to conclusions. My suggestion is that people shouldn't make serious accusations about websites without first checking their facts. Make sure you're not just assuming things and make sure that you are aware of the details first. Imagine if you start a rumour that spreads like wildfire and it turns out to be false.

If anyone wants to post a reply then don't mention specific sites or talk about age (the mods won't allow it).

Dionysus wrote:

come on, this is not the forum, to talk about these kind of sites, i'm pretty sure there are tons of forums, where you can talk about your interest.
these is a 18+ leave it that way and go on with other stuff
what grifter said in the other thread is true word by word

[URL=http://Serv1.imagehigh.com][/URL] you all can't be serious
but [URL=http://Serv1.imagehigh.com][/URL] here are so many girls in this forum all <18,
legal and absolute b-e-a-utiful. what more do you need ?


i've collected some samples for you


so have fun [URL=http://Serv3.imagehigh.com][/URL]

and stop [URL=http://Serv3.imagehigh.com][/URL]

everyone, who likes it > 18 . sorry i can't [URL=http://Serv3.imagehigh.com][/URL] you

i admit that i added the avril pic for my own enjoyment [URL=http://Serv1.imagehigh.com][/URL]

I believe this was a rule about the TF girls that should apply to all girls posted in this fourm. IMO it will solve the problem and the Mods will remove the things that need to be removed.




1. All our models are at least 18 y.o. Don't discuss the age of our models.
We are trying our best to find beautiful YOUNG LOOKING baby-faced petite girls. The girls you like the most and the girls that make our sites exceptional. You haven't any reason to worry they are only young looking. All our girls are of legal age.
Discussing the age of Funs Studio models are strictly prohibited.
Topics will be removed ! Your Login and IP address will be banned !

you won't get these sets dingo

winter-soldier wrote: ONE PLACE NO ONE WILL GET ANY SETS AT ALL IS HERE https://www.forumophilia.com/search.php?search_author=winter-soldier

What I was saying was that I know people have made certain comments in threads here that were incorrect and so the point I'm making is that people shouldn't make serious accusations just on assumption. I didn't start the thread to debate the merits of site "X" or site "Y". I just think it's irresponsible to wildly cast aspersions without taking the time to check your facts first. It's a perfectly reasonable suggestion considering how fast rumours can spread on the internet.

spidey wrote:

Could ya maybe post some of Vivienne over in the pic section ??..Nvr seen her B4 and I like....

TYVM

ndik8 wrote:

You may want to try here:

https://www.forumophilia.com/topic12334.html

and here:

https://www.forumophilia.com/topic14549.html#118203


_________________

winter-soldier wrote:

Hahahaha Look buddy

I have read all the crap that you posted about me latley , and it seems all one has to do is go back and look at the comments you make and already made on sites that are in question of being <18


Quote:


Then we will see who is calling the kettle black



At least the topless sets i have of her are paid for and def 18 >


And as with your posts to all of us latley putting words in our mouths ? <<< I never asked for or said I needed these sets I just wanted to share some pics...





BTW thanks for being such a DICKHEAD , I have some great friends that I have made here that are better than any of the one's I know in the real world , sorry your not one of them.

Ooo And how original , people here dont like me and never will so what ! get used to it I have Still cant stop me form getting somthing I already have, no instead because of people like you I cant share the wealth here any more...



O BTW dickwad I did not unlock this thread and dont need the sets but thanks anyway






BTW all you 0 posts losers stop sending me pm's for stuff , I dont share shit and esp not with anyone who has not posted alot of porn



@ Dionysus , thanks for the exellent thread as i said before and say again you have a great mind , so thanks for your input MM..

hi it's me [URL=http://Serv1.imagehigh.com][/URL]

i don't think many of you are into comics, but i tell you what. The current event at marvel comics is called CIVIL WAR: WHOSE SITE ARE YOU ON ?

i try to give you a short backup about the story.
super-heroes are indifferent about the question, if super-heroes should get registered and reveal their secret identity to the authorities. some of the supes are for the registration some against and as result there is a lot of fights between those heros.
I#ve only read the first issue by now, but looks like fun.

i dont know why, but this situation here reminds a little bit of this comic, of course without the fun part

[URL=http://Serv1.imagehigh.com][/URL][URL=http://Serv1.imagehigh.com][/URL]

you may think know :what you say is ridiculous !

and thats exactly my point, anyone of you ever hold his breath for sec and thought what this shit is all about ?

i don't care whose side are you on, but for chris sakes.
don't take this stuff so goddamn seriously[URL=http://Serv1.imagehigh.com][/URL]

i'm pretty sure, there are far more important things in real life to worry about ,for example my summer exams are very close by [URL=http://Serv1.imagehigh.com][/URL]
that is something i take seriously, but not this crap thats written here

hope you understand what i'm trying to say and let it go

or like proxyminer would say "cause only bad vibrations" and the stuff that works in comics and makes fanboys happy looks far more stupid in other situations

hope i didn't insult anyone and we can go on

[URL=http://Serv1.imagehigh.com][/URL] btw when anyone now is curios to know about the comic have a look here www.wizarduniverse.com or this one is great www.newsarama.com for news

see you around

spidey

[URL=http://Serv1.imagehigh.com][/URL]

ndik8 wrote: theres a nice set of her here with hailey https://www.forumophilia.com/topic13065-15.html

One final comment from me. What I heard through the g****vine was that credit-card companies imposed a blanket 18+ policy for modelling sites regardless of content. That meant even model sites with no-nudity, no swimwear, no lingerie, no see-through etc. were now banned. So billing companies were told they had to stop dealing with sites that broke the new policy.

It wasn't a question of legality it was a question of policy. The fact that some websites closed doesn't necessarily mean that they any law was being broken or that the billing companies didn't want to deal with those sites. That is what I wanted to correct. So let's be careful when making serious accusations against people. Ok I've said my piece and I'll shut up now.

Dionysus wrote:

This Comment , Gentlemen ; is the reasonablest Meaning ever about this argued Sites. And a Proof for a healthy Intellect. Respect !
...and it is a good Word at End , because i close this Thread before someone write more foolish Crap about !

Amen