f@me-g1rls - Any chance to see them topless or even nude?

Who doesn't know the little Model Site with Three Young and Stunning Beauties - well Models ..

F@me-G1rls

Here are some interesting replies which lead to this Topic..

mike=)). wrote:

naserd wrote:

vikafan wrote:

I personally checked on alexa and could really figure out how many ppl are visiting .. but since the pagerank is something like 450kth (which is kinda bad .. compared to H€gre-/\rt .. which is 5.000th & M€t-@rt at 1.300th). I think mikes calculation is kinda convincing we should try .. something?
Should be, could we? or maybe not .. discuss about ! we are enough members ..don't you think..

I personally contacted the webmaster since I have some experience with websiteprogramming and SEO .. lets see if he answers.. if not we can forget about that anyway but now its up to you.. your 2 cent .. cheers

PS: No mention of original names, labels or urls

Well, sounds great. While we're at it, let's go after K@ri Sw33ts, and Sh3ri Guz!k, and Mila Kunis and Victoria Justice.

A now defunct forum attempted a membership drive in an effort to leverage a model webmaster into providing material that they wanted to see. I don't recall the exact terms and conditions, but I do know that within days of attaining the desired number of new subscriptions the forum Admin asked everyone to cancel their subscriptions to the model site out of frustration.

Admittedly, elements of the above arrangement were a little unique to say the least, but expecting a model site to permanently change their format based upon a one time member drive seems a little unrealistic (unless they were already planning on updating their format anyway ).

You would probably have better success if you inquired about some sort of custom shoot and pooled your resources toward that.

Well, guys, I gonna contribute to this thread and tell what I sincerily think as I always thought, You saw I replied to the discussion on the fa**-gi*** thread and in the Sherri one, and also I left comments in the Stephi and Missy's sites. So, here's my opinion as it always was.

I start from the fact that I always considered sites and models (specially this ones) always do what they want and feel comfortable with (specially, the girls). There's not any rule or law that says a model MUST and IS OBLIGED TO get topless, then naked, once she turns 18 or if she don't do then the girl, the site, and everything else related is shit, tame, and waste of time/money.

Also, 99% of this kind of comments always comes from people who never been members on their sites and never had or will have any intention of joining the site, which makes the comments even more hypocritical.

Every site evolves as it have to, or as the people who runs it considers it must. Also, the girls has voice on it, and why should they show their breasts, nipples, pussy, if THEY DON'T WANT TO? Are they obliged to leave the site? Do they have to stop modeling? Does it mean they're crap as model? And WHO ARE WE to decide that?

Of course everybody dreams about watching his favorite model fully naked. I do, as everybody. But, in my case (and I've been about 11 years following this kind of sites) I understand they choose what the want to do. It's like if I go to the same restaurant every day, expecting that if I go during one year the next one I'll eat free everyday. What the hell?

Proposing to increase the members number in exchange of topless or nudity, and comparing sites with others, is nonsense. Why?...

In the first case, we all know the picture sets will end being posted on forums, like this one and so many others. Increasing the number of memberships getting topless or naked is something that, let's be honest, will not happen. Yes, maybe they'll get 50 more, or 100 more, but not 1000 or 5000. And, after some time, the sources to get it free will make people stop renewing the memberships.

And about comparing... well, yes, we can look at how many members or visits you can see in Hegre's site, Met-Art, etc. But... this "if this site do this, you should do this too" thing is just empty comparing. Let me ask something I asked in a site's comments and give me your sincere answer. And, first of all, I apologize for the rudeness: would you accept a guy coming to your sister saying "sweetie, if other girls of the neighborhood let me fuck them, you should let me fuck you too"?. Probably you'd beat his face and cut his balls. But, you think you have the right to tell to somebody who is thousands miles away "hey, other sites do this so you MUST do it too".

So, what a site does is not what EVERY site must do. We all agree that sites, being as they are a business like any other, must improve or attract attention. But always according to what THEY want. And if what horny guys like us expects fits their willingness, then we'll all be happy. And if not, don't forget they're not obliged to do nothing they don't PROMISE or ADVERTISE.

I saw how different sites evolved and I still follow some of them. some sites (Christina, for example) now give topless, implied nudity, and some pussy slips. Missy's site, nip slips. In Missy's case it's funny how she clearly say in her Twiter "it's non nude, with occasional nip slips" and people keeps complaining for something she never promised. Then we also have the models like Niki and Pattycake, who never showed a simple nipple on their sites but they showed them clearly on a TV show (Niki) or in a cam site (Patty).

Other models decided to do their own "porn career" like Britney Brookes, who started being one of the "Destinymodels", then opened her site offering topless, then moved to full nudity and ended having hardcore sex.

But let's face the truth, guys. Not every model will let somebody fuck them to earn money on sites or the porn industry, and not every model will accept to have naked pictures of her all around the world.

Everybody can, of course, think what they want, expect what they want, and dream about what they want. Personally I will keep enjoying watching this sites and girls as what they really are, and if they give me a nice surprise one day I'll be happy with this. But, if not, at least I'll not be "disappointed", "deceived", and will not write comments on forums about something that i already knew how it was going to be.

Have a nice weekend everybody!

Hey nacnac! Well written article. Regarding the comparison of sites it was me who gave the information. Someone asked for how many paying members websites like f@me have. I made a search and couldn't find any information about fg. Then I found this topic in general very interesting and made a search for m€t and came automatically to the information about H€gre, too. I also made some effort about f€mj0y and others, but unfortunately without success. So my posting was just an answer or an information but definetly not a comparison.

I know, dude. I didn't say what I said for you. I said what I said in some sites comment pages (specially in Myssyspalace site), 'cause I was fed up of seeing always the same stupid crying about "hey Christina is showing more and you're doing the same crap"... blahblahblah, and blahblahblah. That's why I wrote there the question in that site, comparing with a sister. What I wrote here was just an example, telling what I wrote there, nothing else

nacnac04 wrote:

Not looking to derail the conversation, but Patty has shown considerably more than entire breasts and fully exposed nipple in quite a few site videos. If you were a fan previously but haven't checked her out within the past year then you might want to do so.

Oh my.. something really going on here ..

Its not really about getting the girls nude or something .. with the state they may .. be .. result in the success of some other nude site .. they never will be but what they doing right now is descreasing their members .. and this topic in the original idea should with the good emount of effort behind it should find a way to show the webmaster / photographer where hes need to go ..

non nude sure .. you've seen in so many sets the teasing value of close slips and see through and stuff and this for sure intentionally .. ppl going for it and as always if one hotter thing is delievered they want more of it but in the last sets 2 of these girls wearing more and more and thats not what main contributing member wanna see (as far as they have seen more) it doesnt work the way they are doing it right now ..

ya, doesnt really make sense but somehow lost the interest in this site, since the admin not even replied .. the site looks good and having so much potential to include their members and even more increasing it beside the fact they have to work on it cause its well designed but according the source its kinda... well.. could be better

cheers

uselessbuthot wrote:

When something has been seen 50 times, believe me, the interest is not the same anymore.

Anyways, being honest again... I prefer this than what other sites does, becoming sites that rotates their sets, putting the last ones of the list in the first place, week by week, pretending they're "new stuff", once they get topless or the sets reached the "highest hotness" status, and make easy moeny with that.