Admins seem to be quite rude at this place (except
Igor G).
Here seems to be a clear directive on how to treat people and content "equally". Some posts are more equal than other ones.
1st oron is good, no matter if there is anything else against the rules.
2nd threads which are not positive about oron are locked.
3rd if there is a post about oron which can be interpreted in a negative way in a discussion-thread, then the complete thread is deleted.
Some threads are just locked, other had been deleted.
IMHO other (old) members have a similar opinion:
A new hoster isn't necessarily bad. A promoting forum for a specific hoster can be run according some rules of interaction between people.
The way, how respectfull and how honestly the board [I'm not talking about the hoster-list] has been changed doesn't show much respect to the members.
The way, how people (acting according to the rules) are treated and how the "special-rules for special users" are en**** has been noticed by the members aswell. Who can trust such a new administration?
Monkey D. Ruffy wrote:
IMO forumophilia.com is a completely new board, not just a different board than it was some weeks ago. The new board didn't start at zero with an empty database, it has already many posts and members in database - are we considered to be nothing more than replaceable and exchangable "entries"?