svinto wrote:Sorry about the previous testreport.
Was a bit sleepy and didn't attacked it systematically.
My RS --> MU investigation.
I have a Premium at both places.
On RS I had to set the file I wanted to transfer to have "Traffic Share" enabled. Opposed to what I usually have "Normal download".
This will reduce my "Traffic share" account.
The account could be reinbursed either by buying volume https://ssl.rapidshare.com/cgi-bin/premiumzone.cgi?bodhelp=Hilfe+%2F+Infos or change in RS Settings for Download Traffic Management to let it use your Premium points.
I also used, what you pointed out, a modifyed url containing my RS premium account info for logging in.
My MU --> RS investigation.
Haven't succeded at all.
I only get a 33kB file.
I don't have any spare MU account to lend for the testing.
Bugger, I was hoping MU would do the job
The 33Kb file behaviour you get with MU->RS sounds very similar to what I get with RS->MF. In that case the file is the HTML for a page that looks something like dead link
this one[/url], but with the speed dials. If you still have the file, download it, change the extension to html and double click - I think you'll get an MU page of some sort.
Going the other way, MF->RS I get the file, it has the correct content but the wrong file name. The file name is the 9 byte MediaFire file id prefixed by an underscore ('_') - because ? are not allowed in POSIX file names.
So you end up with a file name something like
_asb123def rather than
201001_Playboy.pdf, and unlike most file hosts RS does not provide file renaming.
I don't understand why points come into this at all. I can move files back & forth between RS, HF and SM and my points at all three stay the same - because you get no points for downloading your own stuff. All my files are marked for normal downloads.
Points are not an issue at MF. If you want the features of Pro - you pay $7/month minimum, period.
I think I should say why I am looking at this.
My idea is to have files on two file hosts, both of which can be posted at FO and which both support bi-directional file transfers. Currently I am doing this with RS and MF, but I can't transfer files directly between RS and MF, I have to use HF as a bridge. That's OK for me I post HF elsewhere, so I want my stuff on HF. But others who want to leverage from my experience don't want to post elsewhere, nor do they want to pay for an HF account just to get file back and forth to MF
But it looks as though MU<->RS suffers similar problems to MF<->RS.
Both MU and MF use file id links rather than direct file links, it would seem that RS does not handle file id links correctly only direct file links.
I really think that the file host issue need to be reconsidered
A major functional consideration should be the ability to easily move files back & forth between the allowable file hosts. I would suggest hotfile, it is very straight forward, it is easy to to download from it and it is as fast and as reliable as RS. And I can attest to the fact that bi directional file transfers work - I do it every day.
The fact that uploaders can earn money from hotfile is irrelevant, uploaders earn money from MU and its an allowable FO file host.
Thanks
svinto as always you're an Angel - maybe I should promote you to Archangel. Eventually you might make it to Cherubim (highest beings in the celestial hierarchy, Angels being the lowest)
w-e