Has Linksave.in been approved???

Maybe i'm slow but I haven't seen anywhere that it has been approved, but there's quite a few posts using it now:

links removed

If it has been approved I will begin using it, because links in DLC-containers do last a whole lot longer than "naked" links.

Regards

RabidSquirrel

No, RabidSquirrel, you are not slow at all and you have seen right: it is not mentioned anywhere since it is still not allowed.

I'm not sure it helps if a thread is monitored by some payed agents and i've seen a lot of dead linksave-containers on other boards, so it does not seem to be a real solution to this problem.

I've taken care of the links above and removed them from your post, so it does not fall back on you ...
_________________
> Amateurs | > Handjobs | JAV Movies

For my part I like using linksave.in as protector for my links. It is far better than secured.in.
secured.in has, like at the moment, and very often mysql errors and I am getting annoyed of that. So of this "beta" site I am not sure if my effort for protecting by secured.in is sure or my links last longer.

I need a link protector where I can protect many links into one folder file link. By checking your allowed link protectors at this time I just found this beta secured.in.

I suggest to take linksave.in onto your white list, please.

Sincerely,
Nice Guy

mr_nice_guy wrote:

I have initiated a discussion between the mods if it could be allowed or not.
_________________
[URL=http://www.casimages.com][/URL]