is angel funs and teenfuns legal

thinking of joining some of the girls look well young

Attention User Corrosion !

You are in really in Trouble !
This Site contains Pornmaterial !!!
Safe your Soul and leave this place , hurry !!!
Contact your Provider and tell him ,the WWW is full with Pornography and let delete your Internetconnection!

Citation of Rule Nr 1
"...1. All our models are at least 18 y.o. Don't discuss the age of our models.
We are trying our best to find beautiful YOUNG LOOKING baby-faced petite girls. The girls you like the most and the girls that make our sites exceptional. You haven't any reason to worry they are only young looking. All our girls are of legal age.
Discussing the age of Funs Studio models are strictly prohibited.
Topics will be removed ! Your Login and IP address will be banned ! ..."

besides , Prox greets the USA...

Proximer264, you are killing me!

In answer to Corrosion, yes the two sites are very legal. The models are selected for their appearance and body type. In addition, some of them have modeled before on other sites that no longer exist, so they may be known for previous work. However anything that currently carries the logos of either site is legal in most countries of the world.

Don't wave the pictures around in Iran or Mississippi.

nice one proximer!
and everyone should be made to have this rule printed on their forehead before joining.

Elmo:
Don't forget Alabama.
They get testy when they feel left out.

I'm not sure. I think in Alabama it's forbidden to wave pictures of your sister naked, but everybody got 'em just the same.

I've heard that certain parts of Tasmania are like that too.........but I might have been too pissed at the time to remember properly...........

Elmo wrote:

Hmm ... i think for the Iran Guys the are already a bit to Old!

Edit :Also they are not hairy enough and the Moustache is missing!


And before someone says i´m a racist ... no i´m not!

corrosion wrote:

yes thats a problem I think that they should be illegal or at least come with a surgeon generals heath warning
SURGEON GENERAL HEALTH WARNING wrote:

followed by
SURGEON GENERAL HEALTH WARNING wrote: